@BertNaked 139493 wrote:

That is indeed infected.

If it was infected would that contribute to the poor quality?

Or does the infection have little to do with the quality and 99% to do with the artist?

If it was infected it must have been small and barely noticeable. Thus how would a person know to address it and avoid ruining their tattoo.

I’m…[Read more]

@poxphobia 139486 wrote:

Okay that tattoo has healed HORRIBLY. On the pic taken after two days it’s also infected. Looks like a beginning one, so the infection probably came from something she did after leaving the shop. It looked OK when it was fresh, but it’s healed really bad. It’s almost hard to believe the black is so completely…

[Read more]

@Sam-I-Am 139482 wrote:

Welcome.

That’s very poorly done.

Find a new tattoo artist and let them suggest repair options.

Thanks.

Here are some more photos.

This is right after it was done. I thought it looked pretty good.

And this was 2 days after. I don’t have experience with tattoos but it looked pretty harsh at the time. She said her…[Read more]

Yes, it was done professionally.

So as an example the dark areas around the straight line at the bottom (the whole line should be green but it just looks muddy at the bottom) is a blowout? I wasn’t sure if maybe it was just the skin still healing and thus there are dark areas where the scab was and it’s a discoloration of the skin.

What this…[Read more]