@Mistress_Of_Pain 127059 wrote:
Well back piece is first anyway after my right arm is done. Fiance is still saying NO to a chest tattoo, we’ll see. My money, he can’t really tell me what I can or cannot do in terms of my tattoos so
If I told my wife no chest tattoo, she would tell me, “okay, no chest!” (I don’t want to play with my own nipples for the rest of my life)
Yea that is the only down fall to getting a back tattoo for sure. I do wear a lot of tank tops though so it would be able to be seen. My friend just finished up hers and it looks awesome and she shows it off whenever she can. As far as the chest piece itself, i would want it like the ones pictured already. Going across my whole upper chest. I think a lot of why he says no is because he doesn’t want other guys checking out my chest if you catch my drift lol which is obviously understandable but still
@buttwheat 127062 wrote:
The problem with back tattoos is that you can’t see them.
I like to get my tattoos where I can see and enjoy them. After all, I’m the one who paid for them.
That being said – if I ever run out of room on my arms and legs, or the right artist were to suggest it, then I’d consider my back. A chest piece would be just a little to hard-core for me and my lifestyle (and age). If you like them though, I say GO FOR IT.
Like I said before, if you are trying to decide between the two, I suspect you are going to end up with both. (And I suspect that both will be stellar pieces.)
I’m sure I will end up with both more than likely. I’ll probably start with my back first and move on from there.
Speaking of back pieces, like I said my friend just got hers completed. She got it from Zeb Palmer of Old Larimer Street Tattoo here in Denver. She has plenty of money invested in this and I think it turned out absolutely amazing!
@ArniVidar 127100 wrote:
Is the red/brown in there actual color, or just a fresh tattoo?
The part that is super red is a fresh tattoo. Pics were right after it was done
You must be logged in to create new topics.
