<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tattoo Forum | sonkae | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.thetattooforum.com/members/sonkae/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thetattooforum.com/members/sonkae/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for sonkae.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 03:03:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4f5790556d27b8492aec03682da380d5</guid>
				<title>replied to the topic Laser Tattoo Removal Technologies in the forum Tattoo Removal Discussion</title>
				<link>http://www.thetattooforum.com/forums/tattoo-forums/tattoo-removal-discussion/34149-laser-tattoo-removal-technologies/#post-90001</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 05:37:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ross, I completely agree with you on that point&#8230; it does seem like the more removable the tattoo, the less seriously people take their decision to get it and the less thought gets put into what should be a very meaningful decision; it&#8217;s as if we&#8217;ve lost the whole notion of permanence when it comes to tattoos&#8230; Nonetheless, as a biochemist I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-12670"><a href="http://www.thetattooforum.com/forums/tattoo-forums/tattoo-removal-discussion/34149-laser-tattoo-removal-technologies/#post-90001" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>